 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MiCRA is
a Washington, DC-based economic consulting firm specializing in applied
microeconomic theory,
industrial organization, and econometrics. We provide high-quality economic
analysis, expert testimony, litigation support, and economic research
to law firms, corporations, government agencies, and trade associations
in matters involving a wide range of industries and legal contexts. Our
Practice Areas focus on a broad spectrum of economic and legal issues,
including:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
Abraham v. Intermountain Health Care et al.
David Eisenstadt presented testimony using game theory to show that Intermountain had unilateral incentives not to enter into a contract with the plaintiff class of optometrists. more> |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||