|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rome Ambulatory Surgery Center v. Rome Memorial Hospital |
|
|
David Eisenstadt testified that Rome Memorial Hospital’s exclusive contracts with several major third-party payers constituted predatory and exclusionary conduct and were the cause of plaintiff’s exit from the ambulatory surgery market. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siegal
Transfer v. Carrier Express |
|
|
Jon Joyce prepared
expert witness testimony on market definition and market power. The
client, Bethlehem Steel Corp., prevailed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore
IDA |
|
|
Michael Pelcovits has
been consulted by the telecommunications regulatory agency in Singapore
on competition policies relating to access to submarine cable landing
stations and the local loop infrastructure controlled by SingTel, the
incumbent telephone company. He has written reports and met with the
government officials responsible for making decisions on these issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest
Recreational Industries, Inc. v. Field Turf, Inc. |
|
|
Rick Warren-Boulton served
as the expert witness for Southwest Recreational Industries. His deposition
and trial testimony provided evidence of liability and estimated damages
under the Lanham Act resulting in a favorable decision (Texas). |
|
|
|
|
|
St.
Gobain Acquisition of Carborundum |
|
|
Ken Baseman's analysis
of market definition and competitive effects was influential in persuading
the FTC to allow St. Gobain to acquire Carborundum's specialty refractory
business with only licensing remedies and without divestitures. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sylvester
Jennifer et al. v. Delaware Solid Waste Authority |
|
|
Lloyd Oliver provided
written and deposition testimony for DSWA in a class action case against
DSWA for allegedly violating the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution
by restricting the transportation of solid waste generated in Delaware
to landfills inside of the state; the case was settled on favorable
terms for the Defendant before trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas & Betts
v. IBM |
|
|
Lloyd Oliver provided
written and deposition testimony analyzing damages due the plaintiff
as a result of an alleged breach of contract by IBM in failing to make
Thomas & Betts its exclusive manufacturer of computer connectors.
The case was settled on terms favorable to the plaintiff before trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tolokan
v. Mobil Oil |
|
|
Steve Silberman testified
at trial that there was no economic evidence that Mobil had discriminated
against an independent retailer. The jury found in favor of Mobil. |
|
|
|
|
|
Triennial
Review of unbundling obligations of incumbent local exchange carriers. |
|
|
Michael Pelcovits submitted
several expert reports and declarations to the Federal Communications
Commission concerning which components of the local telephone network
need to be unbundled to facilitate the development of competition. Among
these reports were a model estimating the impact of regulatory decisions
on the level of entry in the marketplace. |
|
|
|
|
|
United
States v. AT&T |
|
|
Rick Warren-Boulton testified
on the effects of vertical integration between Western Electric (equipment
manufacture) and the rest of the Bell system. |
|
|
|
|
|
United
States v. Carilion Health System |
|
|
David Eisenstadt testified
at trial that the proposed merger would not raise hospital prices. His
testimony helped persuade the Court and jury to rule in favor of Carilion. |
|
|
|
|
|
United
States v. Microsoft Corporation and State of New York ex rel. v.
Microsoft Corporation |
|
|
Rick Warren-Boulton testified
on behalf of the government and plaintiff states that Microsoft had
monopolized the market for PC operating systems and implemented policies
designed to entrench its monopoly position by illegally weakening rivals
such as Netscape that were current for imminent competitive threats. |
|
|
|
|
|
United
States v. Nippon Sanso K. K., et al. |
|
|
Bruce Snapp's testimony
on behalf of defendants concerning market definition and the competitive
effects of defendants' proposed acquisition of Semi-Gas Systems helped
defeat DOJ's request for a preliminary injunction. |
|
|
|
|
|
US
and EC Investigations Lyondell Chemical joint venture with Bayer
AG and Bayer's acquisition of Lyondell's worldwide polyether polyols
business. |
|
|
Lloyd Oliver worked
for Lyondell Chemical in helping to secure US and EC approval for a
multibillion dollar joint venture by two propylene oxide producers to
coordinate existing operations and establish new propylene oxide manufacturing
facilities in Europe. He also consulted on Bayer's concomitant acquisition
of Lyondell's worldwide polyether polyols business and helped to analyze
the effects of technology sharing agreements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Various
Acquisitions by Banknorth Group |
|
|
Bruce Snapp analyzed
the likely competitive effects of several Banknorth acquisitions --
including Bancorp Connecticut, Warren Bancorp, and First Essex -- pursuant
to a review by the Justice Department, Federal Reserve Board, and other
banking regulators. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ventana
Medical Systems, Inc. petitioner to the US Department of Energy |
|
|
Under certain federal contract
terms, patents resulting from those research grants must be licensed
in a manner that will promote competition. Rick Warren-Boulton and Alan
Rockwood provided an expert witness report and Warren-Boulton
also testified at the Department of Energy hearing for the petitioner
on the competitive effects of certain actions and sub-license demands
by Vysis, the patent holder's exclusive licensee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wichita
Clinic, P.A. v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation |
|
|
Jon Joyce provided
expert witness reports and deposition testimony for the Plaintiff. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yamaha
Motor Corp. USA v. Internal Revenue Service |
|
|
Bruce Snapp consulted
on an expert report demonstrating that Yamaha transferred motorcycles
to its U.S. subsidiary at comparable arms-length prices and that losses
incurred in the U.S. were the result of market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
|
ZC
Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. et al. v. Nationsdata.com, Inc.,
et al. |
|
|
Bruce Snapp testified
at trial on behalf of plaintiffs concerning future economic damages
that could result from the defendants' alleged theft of proprietary
information for a software product to manage mortgage escrow accounts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cases
by Name 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|